Dear all,
Here’s your blog assignment for this week. Select one of the following three interpretations of the film, Heading South, to respond to. Contribute a post providing your reaction to the interpretation you’ve selected, and focus on following the excellent models your peers offered in class today: put pressure on a particular word what impression does it give? etc), provide counter-evidence to challenge an interpretation, define one of the words used in the review but from your perspective and other valid interpretive strategies.
Your blog post is due by midnight Saturday evening, and your response to one of your classmates is due by next Thursday midday.
REVIEWS OF Heading South (2005, dir. Laurent Cantet)
ONE
“The film is an engagement with a pattern of tourism and globalization that is inspired by the feminist movement of the 1970s. It is attentive to ethnic and linguistic realities; ultimately, it is a study in solidarities against the many forms of oppression that the North imposes on its women and others”
SOURCE: Françoise Lionnet, “Postcolonialism, language, and the visual: By way of Haiti,” Journal of Postcolonial Writing, Vol. 44, No. 3, September 2008, 227 – 232
REVIEWS OF Heading South (2005, dir. Laurent Cantet)
TWO
“The globalisation of the sex industry, and the creeping sense that, like pornography, sex tourism will shrug aside moral objection through the sheer weight of its profitability, is a hot-button topic. Just after this movie was premiered at last year’s Venice Film Festival, the Haitian-domiciled Danish film-maker Jorgen Leth found himself in disgrace after admitting to what was quaintly described as an “affair” with the 18-year-old daughter of his Haitian cleaner – an affair he appeared to suggest was something of a droit de seigneur. Three years previously, Michel Houellebecq’s novel Platform proposed a startlingly plausible vision of a holiday firm offering hypocrisy-free sex tourism in Thailand, a commercial adventure whose fictional catastrophic sequel prefigured the Bali bombings. That novel was much more shocking and more powerful than this movie, however, despite what the two have in common, because it tackles head-on the tougher reality: sex tourism is – of course it is – about men exploiting women. [. . .]
Laurent Cantet’s last two films, Human Resources and Time Out, were brilliant contemporary stories: about how the world of work, blue-collar and white-collar, defines our status and even our existence. Heading South is well acted, but really a disappointingly softcore piece of provocation. “SOURCE: The Guardian, July 6, 2006
REVIEWS OF Heading South (2005, dir. Laurent Cantet)
THREE
With a screenplay in French, English and a smattering of Creole by Mr. Cantet and Robin Campillo, “Heading South” is a beautifully written, seamlessly directed film with award-worthy performances by Ms. Rampling and Ms. Young. As Ellen and Brenda compete for Legba’s love, both imagine that they play a larger role in his life than they actually do. The little we see of Legba away from the resort suggests a complicated past. When a gunman goes after him, the women imagine they are the immediate cause of his troubles. They are, but only to the extent that Legba conspicuously stands out in the flashy clothes Brenda buys him. As much as Ellen and Brenda think they understand him and the state of fear that grips Haiti, they are ultimately clueless. SOURCE: NYT, July8, 2006